Proactive AI for supply chain
Every system was right. The answer was between them
Cimba reads your ERP, warehouse, supplier, and logistics systems continuously and together, and flags the places where the record and the physical world have drifted apart, with the Next Best Action routed to the person who can close the gap.
What changes
Every system is confident, and they disagree
Cimba runs the monitoring, the recommendation, and the execution in one platform, reading the systems you already use. Your ERP, warehouse system, and planning tool stay the book of record.
The record and the reality drift apart quietly
The plan was built on a twelve-day lead time. That supplier has been averaging nineteen for two months and every confirmation says so, but nothing re-reads them once the plan is set. Nothing in the record looks wrong, so nothing gets flagged.
With Cimba: Cimba keeps reading after the plan is made, and surfaces the drift while there is still time to correct it.
Exceptions arrive as a list, not a priority
A planner opens a morning report with two hundred exceptions on it, every one formatted identically. The one that will cost six figures this week looks exactly like the one that will cost forty dollars.
With Cimba: Cimba ranks them against each other by what they cost and how long there is to act, then routes only what needs a decision.
Each handoff hides the problem one step longer
Procurement sees the PO, the warehouse sees the receipt, planning sees the forecast, logistics sees the shipment. A problem that crosses two of them belongs to nobody until it reaches the customer.
With Cimba: Cimba reads across all four continuously, so a problem that lives between teams still has an owner.
Why supply chain teams choose Cimba
Contradictions, not thresholds
Most alerting fires when one number crosses a line. Cimba compares what separate systems claim about the same item, order, or shipment and flags where they have stopped agreeing, which is where the expensive problems sit.
Ranked by cost, not by arrival
Every exception carries what it is likely to cost and how much time is left to act, so a list gets worked from the top rather than worked through end to end.
Routed to whoever can close it
A receiving discrepancy goes to the distribution center, a supplier slip goes to procurement, a forecast break goes to planning. The recommendation arrives with the reasoning and the numbers already attached.
Reads the systems you already run
Cimba works alongside your ERP, warehouse, transport, planning, and supplier systems without replacing any of them, so there is no migration standing between you and the first result.
Fast to prove, safe to trust
New workflows go live in under a week, on a SOC 2 Type II platform with role-based access and an append-only audit trail on every run.
Cuts alerts, doesn't add them
Cimba replaces the exception reports your planners already work through across the ERP, the warehouse, and the supplier portal with one prioritized Next Best Action, routed to the person who owns it. Not another queue to clear.
Proven at scale
Each system was right. The order still missed
Three different failures, one shape. In every case the systems reported correctly, and the problem lived in the space between them.
Thousands
operators on Cimba
10
business units
< 1 wk
to launch a workflow
We walked through how one of these failure modes actually develops in the stockout your dashboard can't see.
Supply chain workflows Cimba runs
Inventory accuracy and phantom stock detection
Compare what the ERP, the warehouse system, and actual sell-through say about the same item, and flag the positions where they have stopped agreeing.
Ready to see the gap before it costs you
See how Cimba turns ERP, warehouse, supplier, and logistics signals into early warnings and the Next Best Action.
Explore more
Frequently asked questions
By catching the problems that no single system reports. Most supply chain failures are visible in the disagreement between two sources rather than in either one alone, and nothing fires an alert when each source looks internally correct. Cimba reads them together continuously and surfaces the contradiction with a recommended next step, while there is still time to change the outcome.
Planning tools answer the question you configured them to answer, and the ERP records what was supposed to happen. Neither tells you that the record and the physical world have separated. Cimba watches across both, explains which one moved, recommends the next step, and can carry it out.
Phantom inventory is stock a system believes it has and does not, whether from a miscount at receiving, shrink, units allocated against an order that never shipped, or a receipt posted against the wrong location. It is hard to catch because the record stays internally consistent. Cimba catches it by comparing what separate systems claim about the same item, so the disagreement surfaces even though each source reads as correct on its own.
Yes. Cimba reads the systems you already run and works alongside them. Your ERP, warehouse system, and planning tool stay the book of record, and there is no migration to complete before the first workflow runs.
Planning and replenishment, procurement and supplier management, distribution center and warehouse operations, logistics, and the commercial teams that carry the consequences downstream. Each gets a governed view and the Next Best Action for their area rather than a shared report nobody owns.
Both. Cimba surfaces the Next Best Action and executes it with human approval, so an exception is resolved rather than added to a list. Every run is logged with its reasoning, so the decision holds up when someone asks about it later.
New workflows go live in under a week. Cimba reads your existing systems, so the time to a first result is set by how quickly the connections are approved, not by a data migration.
Yes. SOC 2 Type II, role-based access, and an append-only audit trail on every run.